RELIC

Collection

Here Comes the Bogeyman

The Bogeyman has no face, and that is exactly why he fits everything. Goya etched him in 1799 as a figure draped head to foot in a sheet with a single shoe poking out, the Spanish press of the nineteenth century handed him a sack and a knife, and the cinema took the whole thing: Michael Myers is credited as The Shape, the demon in Sinister is called Mr. Boogie, and the boy in The Orphanage wears a sack with two holes cut in it. This collection comes from there.

'Que viene el Coco' - Goya, 1799 (dominio público) · la puerta entreabierta · la nana amenazante · la silueta bajo el marco · el saco · rimas infantiles tradicionales · grabados de los Caprichos

Author
Anónimo / tradición oral, con una imagen fijada por Francisco de Goya y Lucientes (1746-1828)
Period
h. 1445-1799 (folclore); el grabado de Goya, 1799
Works drawing on it
7

El folclore es libre. La rima concreta de la novela de Alex North NO: escribe la tuya o usa una tradicional.

What you see in this collection

A standing spectre wrapped in a sheet, faceless, with a hollowed pumpkin for a head: two crooked eyes and an open mouth knifed into the dry rind. Under the lifted hem of the cloth, a gentleman's pointed shoe — the detail that gives away the man underneath. Around him, the other branch of the family: the hessian sack with holes at eye level, the sheet that erases the face, and the three pores of the coconut, the same three that gave the palm's fruit its name.

Goya gave him a face in 1799

On 6 February 1799, eighty prints went on sale in a perfume and liqueur shop on Calle del Desengaño in Madrid. Number 3 is called Que viene el Coco, Here Comes the Bogeyman: etching and burnished aquatint, roughly 219 by 154 millimetres. A seated mother with two children, one throwing his arms up to flee, the other clinging to her. Facing them, standing, a figure wrapped from head to foot in cloth. It has no face. The only human thing about it is a pointed shoe showing beneath the hem: Goya did not draw a monster, he drew somebody dressed as one.

The manuscript commentary held by the Museo del Prado puts it in writing:

“A disastrous abuse of early education. To make a child fear the bogeyman more than his own father, and to force him to dread a thing that does not exist.”

The series was a commercial failure. In 1803 Goya handed the Crown the eighty copper plates and 240 unsold sets in exchange for a pension for his son Javier: in four years, twenty-seven had sold.

Why a coconut is named after a bogeyman

The character is far older than the print. Antón de Montoro uses him around 1445, in a verse where he likens himself to the babies in the cradle who are told “Mind the Coco!”. In Lazarillo de Tormes (1554), Lázaro's half-brother watches Zaide, his own black father, come through the door and points at him shouting “Mother, the bogeyman!”. Covarrubias, in his Tesoro de la lengua castellana (1611), lists it as “a figure that causes fright” in the speech of children and derives it, none too convincingly, from the Hebrew word cus; the fruit's name he explains separately and by another route. The Diccionario de Autoridades dismisses it in 1729 as “a hideous, frightful figure, a grimace like a monkey's, pulled to scare children into behaving”.

The three holes are the key, and here is the part almost nobody knows: the coconut is named after the bogeyman, not the other way round. When the Portuguese reached India at the end of the fifteenth century they found a fruit with no European name and gave it the name of the hobgoblin from their own kitchens. João de Barros tells it in the Décadas da Ásia (Decade III, 1563): the shell has “a sharp shape that means to resemble a nose, set between two round eyes”, and because of that face “our men called it coco, a name women give to anything they want to frighten children with”. It is not the only old account: Fernández de Oviedo wrote in 1535 that the three pits made “the grimace of a little monkey pulling a face”, with no phantom in it at all. The two versions ran side by side for centuries, and modern philology has settled on Barros: M. Sandmann argued the case in the Revista de Filología Española in 1955, after taking the monkey apart, and Corominas and Pascual reconstruct the whole journey — round object, then child-scarer, then the fruit of the coco palm. The hollowed Halloween pumpkin and the coconut on the supermarket shelf are the same face: two eyes and a mouth opened in a dry husk.

The lullaby did the rest. Francisco Rodríguez Marín collected the version around 1880 that almost anyone in Spain can still sing from memory: go to sleep, little one, the Coco is coming and he carries off the children who sleep too little.

The sack, the tallow and the Gádor crime

In Spain the Coco has a dirtier and far more concrete brother: the man with the sack. He is no phantom, he is an adult with a horrible trade. The figure feeds off the sacamantecas, the fat-taker, who opens his victim up for the tallow. The nickname was hung on Juan Díaz de Garayo (1821-1881), a day labourer from the outskirts of Vitoria who raped and killed six women and girls between 1870 and 1879 and died by garrote. It was never proved that he extracted fat from anyone; nobody ever took the name off him either.

What did happen, exactly as told, was the Gádor crime. On 28 June 1910, Bernardo González Parra, seven years old, from Rioja (Almería), was put into a sack and carried to an isolated farmhouse in the district of Gádor. Francisco Ortega, known as el Moruno, had tuberculosis, and the barber and folk healer Francisco Leona had sold him the cure for 3,000 reales: drink a child's blood and rub his warm fat on the chest. They did it. El Moruno went to the garrote, and so did the healer Agustina Rodríguez; Leona died in prison before them. The case filled newspapers across Spain and left a threat lodged in the language for the century that followed.

Carpenter spelled it out

John Carpenter made no secret of the family tree. In Halloween (1978) the killer appears in the credits as The Shape, and the film ends with Laurie saying it was the boogeyman and Loomis answering that, as a matter of fact, it was. The mask cost $1.98: Tommy Lee Wallace picked up a Captain Kirk face in a costume shop on Hollywood Boulevard, widened the eye holes and painted it white. A human face erased to blankness is precisely what Goya got out of a bedsheet.

Stephen King had signed his own five years earlier: The Boogeyman ran in Cavalier in March 1973 and was collected in Night Shift (1978). It is a father telling a psychiatrist that the thing in the wardrobe killed all three of his children; Rob Savage filmed it in 2023 starting from exactly that point, with Lester Billings walking into a different psychiatrist's office and leaving the thing behind in the house. In Sinister (2012), by Scott Derrickson and C. Robert Cargill, the children call the demon Bughuul “Mr. Boogie” and draw him in crayon: they give the bogeyman a friend's name. And The Babadook (2014), by Jennifer Kent, grows out of her short film Monster (2005) and out of the Serbo-Croat babaroga, which means just that. Kent looked to silent cinema for the top hat and the long fingers, shot the effects in camera and shut the monster inside a pop-up book illustrated by Alexander Juhasz: the bogeyman arrives in a story a boy's own mother reads to him.

What is under the sacking

The Spanish version has its masterpiece in The Orphanage (2007), by J. A. Bayona. Tomás wears a cloth sack over his head with two holes at eye level, and the twist is that he is not the monster: he is the deformed boy they kept hidden, Benigna's son. Bayona puts the sackman's sack on the victim.

Outside Spain, hessian is what Jason Voorhees wore before the hockey mask. In Friday the 13th Part 2 (1981) he has a sack with a single eye hole; the model was the faceless killer of The Town That Dreaded Sundown (1976), whose sack had two. And Sam, the small trick-or-treater in Michael Dougherty's Trick 'r Treat (2007), folds both branches of this page into one design: orange pyjamas, a sack with buttons for eyes and, underneath it, what designer Breehn Burns drew from Dougherty's sketches, a cross between a skull and a pumpkin.

Where the designs come from

Plate 3 from "Los Caprichos": Here comes the bogey-man (Que viene el Coco)
Plate 3 from "Los Caprichos": Here comes the bogey-man (Que viene el Coco) · Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes) · 1799 record
A deputy's nightmare: –Oh my friend, what has happened? –I dreamed I was invalidated, from 'News of the day,' published in Le Charivari, December 7, 1869
A deputy's nightmare: –Oh my friend, what has happened? –I dreamed I was invalidated, from 'News of the day,' published in Le Charivari, December 7, 1869 · Honoré Daumier · December 7, 1869 record
A deputy's nightmare: – Oh my friend, what has happened? – I dreamed I was invalidated, from "News of the day"
A deputy's nightmare: – Oh my friend, what has happened? – I dreamed I was invalidated, from "News of the day" · Honoré Daumier · December 7, 1869 record
Funereal Folly, from "The Disparates" (Follies / Irrationalities)
Funereal Folly, from "The Disparates" (Follies / Irrationalities) · Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes) · ca. 1815–19 (published 1864) record
When Day Breaks We Will Be Off, Plate 71
When Day Breaks We Will Be Off, Plate 71 · Francisco de Goya (Spanish, 1746–1828) · 1799 record
They Spin Finely, Plate 44
They Spin Finely, Plate 44 · Francisco de Goya (Spanish, 1746–1828) · 1799 record
They Have Flown, Plate 61
They Have Flown, Plate 61 · Francisco de Goya (Spanish, 1746–1828) · 1799 record
A Bad Night, Plate 36
A Bad Night, Plate 36 · Francisco de Goya (Spanish, 1746–1828) · 1799 record
Blow, Plate 69
Blow, Plate 69 · Francisco de Goya (Spanish, 1746–1828) · 1799 record
Out Hunting for Teeth, Plate 12
Out Hunting for Teeth, Plate 12 · Francisco de Goya (Spanish, 1746–1828) · 1799 (printed c. 1855) record
Füssli - The Nightmare, 1781, 1885,0314.198
Füssli - The Nightmare, 1781, 1885,0314.198 · Henry Fuseli · 1781 date QS:P571,+1781-00-00T00:00:00Z/9 record
Henry Fuseli (1741–1825), The Nightmare, 1781
Henry Fuseli (1741–1825), The Nightmare, 1781 · Tulip Hysteria / Go to albums · 2005-09-22 11:55:47 record
Henry fuseli, l'incubo, 1781
Henry fuseli, l'incubo, 1781 · Sailko · 2016-11-05 20:13:51 record
The Nightmare
The Nightmare · Henry Fuseli · 1781 date QS:P571,+1781-00-00T00:00:00Z/9 record
Caprichos de Goya
Caprichos de Goya · Goya, Francisco, 1746-1828 record
Caprichos de Goya
Caprichos de Goya · Goya, Francisco, 1746-1828 record
Caprichos de Goya
Caprichos de Goya · Goya, Francisco, 1746-1828 record
Caprichos de Goya
Caprichos de Goya · Goya, Francisco, 1746-1828 record
The sleep of reason produces monsters (No. 43), from Los Caprichos title QS:P1476,en:"The sleep of reason produces monsters (No. 43), from Los Caprichos" label QS:Len,"The sleep of
The sleep of reason produces monsters (No. 43), from Los Caprichos title QS:P1476,en:"The sleep of reason produces monsters (No. 43), from Los Caprichos" label QS:Len,"The sleep of · Francisco Goya · 1799 date QS:P571,+1799-00-00T00:00:00Z/9 record
Spanish: Capricho № 43: El sueño de la razón produce monstruos The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters title QS:P1476,es:"Capricho № 43: El sueño de la razón produce monstruos" label
Spanish: Capricho № 43: El sueño de la razón produce monstruos The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters title QS:P1476,es:"Capricho № 43: El sueño de la razón produce monstruos" label · Francisco Goya · circa 1797-1798 record

Reading

Works drawn from this source

Why this can be used

There are two layers here, and both are free. The first is folklore: the Coco and the man with the sack have no author. Their oldest written traces — Antón de Montoro around 1445, the cry of “Mother, the bogeyman!” in Lazarillo de Tormes (1554), Covarrubias's definition of 1611 — have gone centuries without a rights holder to ask. The second is Goya. In Spain, the Spanish Intellectual Property Act keeps the long term of 80 years after an author's death for anyone who died before 7 December 1987, and applies the 70-year term only to those who died later; the count begins on 1 January of the year following the death (article 30 of the consolidated text of the Spanish Intellectual Property Act, the TRLPI). Francisco de Goya died on 16 April 1828, so his 80 years run from 1 January 1829: his work has been in the public domain since 1 January 1909, and “Los Caprichos” were printed and sold in 1799. The eighty copper plates have been in the Calcografía Nacional since 1803, and digitised impressions are held by the Museo del Prado, the BnF and the Metropolitan. Even so, the design in this collection is original: it takes the motif of the muffled figure and the shoe under the robe, it does not reproduce the print.

RELIC does not sell official merchandise of any film or series. The designs are our own and come from works whose rights have expired. Legal notice.